Swarnlata Saraf*, Sunil
M. Hargude, Chanchal Deep Kaur and Shailendra Saraf
University
Institute of pharmacy, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur (C.G.) – 492010, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: swarnlata_saraf@rediffmail.com
ABSTRACT
Allium sativum, family Alliaceae
possessess antixidant, antimicrobial,
antitumour, antimutagenic, antiinflammatory, antiviral and antiulcer properties. The
aim of this study was to take the benefit of the nature of A. sativum extract and prepare shampoo
incorporating in the herbal constituent base and evaluate this natural herbal
shampoo. The herbal shampoo formulations comprising of aqueous extract of Allium sativum (5% to 30% w/w), coconut oil, castor
oil, olive oil, fragrance were prepared and evaluated for physicochemical
parameters and the results showed the production of stable herbal shampoos. The
pH (6.22 ± 0.01 to 5.01± 0.02), percentage of solids (23.21± 0.02 to 25.41± 0.04), , dirt dispersion, surface tension (37.25
± 0.45 to 39.87 ± 0.15), viscosity (6.5±0.2 to 5.4±0.2 ), skin irritation test ( no irritation) and visual
stability .Formulations were clear, had good foam formation, foam quality and
retention with proper rheological properties and skin compliances. The
formulations with 10 % extract showed best results of evaluation parameters.
The efficacy was in the range 10 % extract containing shampoo (F2) >5 %
extract containing shampoo (F1) > 20 % extract containing shampoo (F3)>
30 % extract containing shampoo (F4).
KEYWORDS: Allium sativum,
antimicrobial herbal shampoo, natural compositions.
INTRODUCTION:
Allium sativum, family Alliaceae
has been reported to possess antixidant,
antimicrobial, antitumour, antimutagenic,
antiinflammatory, antiviral and antiulcer properties.
1 Garlic and its extracts have been used to treat infections for
thousands of years. 2 Allicin (the name
being derived from that of the garlic species Allium sativum) is considered to be the main
biologically active antimicrobial phytochemical
produced in garlic extracts, and was first recognised
as such in 1944. 3
Shampooing is the
most common form of hair treatment. Shampoos have primarily been products aimed
at cleansing the hair and scalp. Selected ingredients of shampoo that have been
popular with the consumer are currently under attack because of potential risks
associated with their use (e.g. halogenated organic compound, formaldehyde,
musk fragrance and crude coal tar). 4
Formulating
cosmetics using completely natural raw materials is a difficult task. The
challenge lies in selecting materials that can be rationally justified as
‘natural’ and formulating them into cosmetics whose functionality is comparable
with their synthetic counterparts. 5 Selecting the evaluation
parameters of a shampoo is a challenging task, simply because of the multitude
of both subjective and instrumental test methodologies available for this
purpose.6 A more radical approach in popularizing herbal shampoo
would be to change the consumer expectations from a shampoo, with emphasis on
safety and efficacy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Bulbs of Allium sativum
(garlic) were collected and authentified by the
herbarium of University Institute of Pharmacy, Pt. R.S. University, Raipur and
used for the preparation of extract. Extract was used for shampoo formulation.
Potassium hydroxide, glycerin, ethyl alcohol, methyl paraben,
lemon grass oil , coconut oil , olive oil, castor oil were purchased from Loba chemicals.
Expression of Allium sativum bulbs:
200 grams of
bulbs of Allium sativum were
taken and expressed in hydraulic press (Remi Motors)
and the active constituents were removed with distilled water. Filtered with
muslin cloth and filtrate was allowed to centrifuge at 2000 rpm. The
supernatant was collected and incorporated in the shampoo base formula.
Preparation of
shampoo:7
Coconut oil,
olive oil and castor oil were saponified with
potassium hydroxide using reflux condenser. After complete saponification,
glycerin was incorporated with stirring followed by mixing of garlic extract.
Ethyl alcohol, methyl paraben used as preservative
and lemon grass oil used for masking the pungent smell of extract. Four
different formulations F1, F2, F3 and F4 were prepared taking 5%, 10% , 20% and
30 % w/w of extract respectively as shown in table I given below
Table 1: Composition of formulations of
shampoo
Composition
of shampoo formulations |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
%
w/w |
%
w/w |
%
w/w |
%
w/w |
|
Coconut
oil |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Olive
oil |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
Castor
oil |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
Potassium
hydroxide |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
Glycerin |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
Ethyl
alcohol |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
Allium sativum extract |
5.0 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
30.0 |
Lemon
grass oil |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
Methyl
paraben |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
Distilled
water q.s. |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
CHARACTERISATION:8,9
Prepared
1% v/v solution of shampoo formulations by mixing, 2 milliliters (40 drops) of
shampoo with 200 ml of distilled water. The shampoo was taken in the beaker and
then slowly added distilled water. After thorough mixing of shampoo and water
all the evaluation parameters were determined.
pH:
1%
shampoo solution was used to determined the pH by using the pH meter (Elico 243 Sl. No. 1320/2006)
Percent
of Solids:
Weighed
a clean dry evaporating dish and recorded the initial weight of evaporating
dish. 4 grams of shampoo formulation (not the 1% solution) was taken in the
evaporating dish. Weighed the dish and shampoo and recorded Initial weight of
shampoo and dish. Calculated the exact weight of the shampoo only and recorded
the Initial weight of shampoo only. Put the evaporating dish with shampoo on
the hot plate until the liquid portion has evaporated. After drying, weighed
the dish and shampoo solids and results were noted.
Foam
Formation (Shake Test):
Test
C and Test D are done together make sure your read Test D before you start.
Took
50 ml of the 1% shampoo solution in a 250 ml graduated cylinder and recorded
the volume. Then covered the cylinder with hand and shaken 10 times. The total
volume of the contents was recorded after shaking. Calculated the volume of the
foam and recorded the size of the bubbles.
Foam
Quality and Retention:
Immediately
after the Shake Test (Test C), time was recorded. Recorded the volume of foam
at 1-minute intervals for 5 minutes as depicted in the Figure 1.
Surface Tension:
Prepared
1% v/v solution of shampoo by mixing 2 milliliters (40 drops) of shampoo with
200 ml of distilled water. The shampoo was taken in the beaker and then slowly
added distilled water. After thorough mixing of shampoo and water the surface
tension was measured by using stalagmometer (Borosil Pvt. Ltd.).
Skin
irritation test:
Applied the
solution of prepared shampoo on skin and kept for 5 min and observed for
redness of skin and irritation there, were no any red coloration and the
irritation to the skin
Visual stability:
The prepared
shampoo was tested for the visual stability for 21 days at room temperature
with relative humidity 65±5, and observed for color change and pH. There were no changes in color and pH of shampoo within
21 days and no any phase separation between oil and water.
Viscosity:
Viscosity was
determined by using the Ostwald viscometer (Borosil
Pvt. Ltd.).
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
The results of
visual inspection of series of formulations are listed in Table 1. As can be
seen, all formulations were clear and had the good characteristics with respect
to foaming. The main challenge with this formulation was of characteristic
smell of A. sativum
extract. With less concentration, i.e. formulation F1 and F2 were free from
characteristic smell and were acceptable, but in F2 and F3 the smell was
observed.
Table 2: Evaluation of Formulations for physical appearance, pH , Solids and viscosity
Formulation
Code |
Physical
Appearance |
pH |
Solids (%) |
Surface tension
(dy. /cm) |
Viscosity (
Poise) |
F1 |
Clear, good foaming, no
characteristic smell |
6.22
± 0.01 |
23.21± 0.02 |
38.45
± 0.22 |
6.5±0.2 |
F2 |
Clear, good foaming, no
characteristic smell |
5.82
± 0.03 |
24.52± 0.01 |
37.25
± 0.45 |
6.1±0.4 |
F3 |
Clear, good foaming,
slight characteristic smell |
5.53± 0.04 |
25.23± 0.02 |
39.23
± 0.13 |
5.8±0.1 |
F4 |
Clear, good foaming,
characteristic smell of extract
observed |
5.01± 0.02 |
25.41± 0.04 |
39.87
± 0.15 |
5.4±0.2 |
The pH of
shampoos has been shown to be important for improving and enhancing the
qualities of hair, the current trend to promote shampoos of lower pH is one of
the ways to minimize damage to the hair. Mild acidity prevents swelling and
promotes tightening of the scales, there by inducing shine. 10 As
seen from table 2, all the shampoos were acid balanced and were ranged at pH
near to the skin pH. On increasing the extract
concentration the acidity of the formulation increased. The result of percent
of solids contents is tabulated in table 2, and was found between 23-26%. As a
result, they were easy to wash out. If the shampoo has too many solids it will
be hard to work into the hair or too hard to wash out. 9
The foam quality
and stability of formulations were observed as depicted in figure 2, the volume
changed from 115 to 59 for F1, 125 to 67 for F2, 110 to 55 for F3 and 107 to 52
for F4 in five minutes. All the formulations showed good foam quality and
retention but the range was F2>F1>F3>F4. As foam production and
retention is very important with respect to consumer palatability and
acceptance hence it becomes important evaluation parameter for the formulations
Figure 1: Change
in Foam retention volume with respect to time
It has been
mentioned that a proper shampoo should be able to decrease the surface tension
of pure water to about 40 dynes/cm 11. Surface tension values
obtained were 38.45 ± 0.22 for F1, 37.25 ± 0.45 for F2, 39.23 ± 0.13 for F3 and
39.87 ± 0.15 for F4. As observed in Figure 2 maximum reduction was by formulation
F2 having 10 % of extract. The reduction in surface tension of water from 72.8
dynes/cm to 37.25 dynes/ cm by the herbal shampoos is an indication of
their good detergent action.
Figure 2: Surface tension of various
shampoo formulations
The viscosity was in the range 5-6 poise
which indicates the great fluidity, which makes formulation easy to apply on
and easy to spread on hair. Formulated shampoos did not show any skin irritation on application showing the safety
of the constituents present.
As seen from the results, it is possible to
formulate a natural herbal shampoo by using garlic aqueous juice which has
antimicrobial and antifungal activity that is better approach with respect to
various shampoos having synthetic chemicals as antimicrobial agents. From the
above study it was concluded that all these preliminary physico
chemical and stability studies suggested for utility of herbal shampoo with
economy and consumers compliance.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Authors are
thankful to Department of Science and Technology for financial assistance under
FIST scheme (SR/FST/LS1-013/2010) and Director University Institute of
Pharmacy, Pt, Ravishankar Shukla
University, Raipur [C.G.] for providing laboratory and all other facilities required
for this work.
REFERENCES:
1.
Reeve VE, Bosnic
M, Rosinova E and Boehm-Wilcox C. A garlic extract
protects from ultraviolet B (280–320 nm) induced suppression of contact
hypersensitivity. Photochem Phytobiol.
58; 1993: 813–817.
2.
Hahn G. In: Koch HP, Lawson LD, eds.
Garlic: the science and therapeutic application of Allium sativum L and related species (2nd
edn). Baltimore Williams and Wilkins, 1996: 1–24.
3.
Cavallito C,
Bailey JH. Allicin, the antibacterial principal of Allium sativum. Isolation,
physical properties and antibacterial action. J Am Chem Soc. 66; 1944: 1944–52.
4.
Aghel N., Moghimipour B. and Dana R.A., Formulation of a Herbal
Shampoo Using Total Saponins of Acanthophyllum squarrosum, Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.
6(3); 2007: 167-172.
5.
Mainkar, A.
and Jolly, C. Formulation of natural shampoos. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 23(1); 2001: 59–62.
6.
Mainkar and
Jolly. Evaluation of commercial herbal shampoos. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 22(5); 2000:
385–391.
7.
Kokate CK, Purohit AP, Gokhale SB “
Pharmacognosy” Twenty Fourth Edition published by Nirali
Prakashan; (2003); 343.
8.
Sorkin M.
Shapiro B. and Kass G.S. The practical evaluation of
shampoos. J.Soc.
Cosmet Chem. 7; 1996: 539-551.
9.
Kumar A and Mali RR, Evaluation of
prepared shampoo formulations and to compare Formulated shampoo with marketed
shampoos, International Journal of
Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research. 3 (1); 2010, Article 025:
120-126.
10.
Griffith J. J. Corcoran R. F. and Akang K.K the pH of hair shampoo. J. Chem. Educ: 54; 1997: 553-554.
11.
Ireland S., Carlino
K., Gould L., Frazier F., Haycock P., Ilton S., Deptuck R., Bousfield B., Verge
D., Antoni K., MacRae L., Renshaw H., Bialachowski A., Chagnon C., and Reddy K., Shampoo after craniotomy: a pilot
study. Can. J. Neurosci. Nurs. 29(1); 2007: 14-19.
Received
on 10.02.2011 Accepted on 20.03.2011
©A&V
Publications all
right reserved
Res. J. Topical and Cosmetic Sci. 2(1):
Jan. –June 2011 page 18-20